This case study is anonymized and based on a real project — client details have been altered under NDA terms.
The client is a senior executive at an international business. The name has been changed under a confidentiality agreement: in this text, referred to as "Ivan Ivanov."
Background
Background
- Geography: Russia (Yandex and Google, Russian), the US (Google, English), the UK (Google, English), the UAE (Google, Arabic and English).
- Client: a senior executive, a public figure in business circles across several countries.
- Initial problem: inaccurate information about the client's past, holding a persistent position in the top 20 across all four markets.
- Project timeline: 8 months.
- Outcome: clean search results for target queries in every country, and the lifting of banking restrictions on the client's accounts abroad.
The starting situation
Under the client's name, inaccurate information about his past held a stable position in the top 20 results on Yandex and Google (Russia), Google (US and UK, English), and Google (UAE, Arabic and English). It wasn't confirmed by any official source, but due to its age and the number of times it had been reprinted, it kept resurfacing on any check.
Content like this automatically feeds into the adverse media screening systems banks use during client compliance checks. That's precisely why some of the client's foreign accounts had been frozen by banks pending clarification — a standard procedure whenever automated screening triggers, not the result of a separate investigation targeting the client.
The task wasn't simply to improve the visibility of positive content, but to systematically clear the top 20 of inaccurate information across three language environments and four jurisdictions at once, so that on the next check, banks would see a clean picture in open sources.
Why the project took 8 months
The first three months went according to plan: suppression through second-tier publications — less expensive outlets that were still relevant in topic and language. That's usually enough for durable suppression of a single publication out of the top 20.
In the fourth month, the same inaccurate information was reproduced by several more outlets in new countries and new languages — pushing some of the already-suppressed positions back into the top. Reliably overcoming this heightened competition for positions required bringing in higher-trust publications — and therefore more expensive ones.
The increase in project budget wasn't the result of a strategic misstep: the new publications were outside the agency's control. The client understood the situation and, without objection, added to the project budget as needed.
The phased strategy
Five stages of the project — from audit to clearing the top 20 and ongoing monitoring.
- Search audit across 4 countries and 3 languages — recording every position in the top 20 per market, with an assessment of tone and source trust.
- Suppression through second-tier publications (months 1–3) — the planned stage, sized for a typical volume of negative content.
- New wave of publications (month 4) — the same inaccurate narrative was reproduced in new countries and new languages, pushing some suppressed positions back into the top.
- Escalation: bringing in higher-trust publications (months 4–6) — to reliably overcome the heightened competition for positions.
- Clearing the top 20 and monitoring (months 7–8) — final stabilization of positions and delivery of a report for the next compliance review.
The outcome
The number of inaccurate publications in the top 20 per country, before the project started and at its conclusion.
After eight months of work, search results for target queries were cleared in all four jurisdictions: fully in Russia, the US, and the UK, and in the UAE with one remaining position requiring a longer legal resolution due to local legislative specifics.
What this delivered for the client: following a repeat review based on the updated picture in open sources, banks lifted the operational restrictions previously placed on accounts under standard compliance procedure.
An important caveat: the outcome depended not only on the work on the digital footprint but also on the banks' own compliance procedures. SEO reputation management doesn't replace legal work or a bank's decision — it removes one of the factors (adverse media) on which that decision is based.





